What's all the buzz about levelizing retirement plan fees?

What plan fiduciaries need to know

It’s important for financial professionals and plan sponsors to have a thorough understanding of the organization’s retirement plan fees and how those fees are paid.

JUMP TO:

How retirement plan fees can be paid Fee levelization vs. revenue sharing Understand your fiduciary responsibility

When it comes to fee payments and allocation, there’s no one right answer.

Instead, it becomes an exercise in prudence requiring the fiduciary to have a repeatable and defendable process in place for evaluating the effect of fees on participants. Take a closer look at allocating retirement plan fees and options to consider when it comes to revenue sharing and fee levelization.

DOC

Create a fee policy statement

This fee policy statement template provides guidelines to help manage your retirement plan fees and expenses with service providers.

Client reviewing retirement plan on laptop while holding a cup of coffee.

How retirement plan fees can be paid

Retirement plan fees cover administrative activities performed by providers. Fees also pay for resources and services — like a website or call center — to help plan participants enroll and reach retirement savings goals.

Typically plan fees are allocated or collected through one or a combination of fee methods. When revenue sharing isn’t used or it doesn’t cover all of the plan administrative expenses, fees can be billed directly to the plan sponsor or paid from participant accounts.

Payment methods to cover plan administrative fees

Revenue sharing

allows a plan sponsor to pay all or a portion of the plan fees implicitly through payments received from the plan’s investment options.¹

Billed fees

Deducted fees

		Per-head fee ($)	Asset-based fee (%)
Participant	Account balance	In proportion to account balance	Flat dollar amount	Basis point amount (illustrated in dollars)
John	$100,000	$300.00	$116.25	0.30% ($300.00)
Mary	$50,000	$150.00	$116.25	0.30% ($150.00)
James	$25,000	$75.00	$116.25	0.30% ($75.00)
Ashley	$12,500	$37.50	$116.25	0.30% ($37.50)
Robert	$6,250	$18.75	$116.25	0.30% ($18.75)

Revenue sharing — how does it work?

Many plan sponsors have plan investment options that have fees deducted from the investment before calculating its published return. These fees, often referred to as the expense ratio, cover the costs to manage the investment option (i.e., investment management, operations, and legal expenses). A portion of the expense ratio can include revenue sharing, which may be used to pay all or a portion of the plan’s administrative expenses. Plan service providers may receive revenue sharing payments from the plan’s elected investment providers to help pay for administrative services provided to the plan.

Note: There are other terms for revenue sharing, such as sub-transfer agency or administrative services fees. Revenue sharing doesn’t apply to all investment options. For instance, company stock investments, self-directed brokerage accounts, and some mutual fund share classes provide no revenue sharing.

Revenue sharing and plan participants

It’s important to know that revenue sharing received from certain investment options can be used to offset administrative expenses of the plan on an investment-by-investment, account-by-account basis. Because of this, participants pay for some or all of the recordkeeping or plan administrative fees through the investments they select.

The amount of revenue sharing paid by an investment option can vary from one option to the next. That means participants may pay a different percentage of the plan’s administrative expenses depending on the investment options they select.

This has raised concern among plan sponsors who want to level the playing field and allocate fees equally among plan participants. There are a number of ways to create fee equality, which we’ll cover in more detail next.

bar chart displaying a comparison of plan fees paid by different participants. John at .30%, Mary at .49%, James at 0%, Ashley at .21% and Robert at .35%

Revenue sharing amounts vary which means some participants may be paying a disproportionate amount of the plan fees.

Fee levelization vs. revenue sharing

There are several different approaches to consider for plan sponsors who want to levelize fees among retirement plan participants. We’ll offer some considerations for each approach along with more thoughts on revenue sharing.

Financial provider discussing revenue statements with a laptop and tablet.

Know your options

Let’s take a closer look at how each fee method is applied to participant accounts. For ease of comparison, we’ve included examples based on a plan with recordkeeping fees of 30 basis points.

Zero revenue sharing approach

For plan sponsors who want a clear separation of plan administrative and recordkeeping fees from investment expenses, a zero revenue sharing option provides a simple approach. This can be accomplished in a couple of ways:

Using investment options that provide no revenue sharing.
Crediting all revenue shared from investment options back to participants.

A plan sponsor may also choose a combination of the two. Once the plan fiduciary selects the approach that best fits their needs, they will then select the most appropriate fee payment method to fit their situation — billed, deducted, asset-based, or a combination. The following examples illustrate collecting recordkeeping fees via an asset-based method:

Zero revenue sharing investment options

Zero revenue sharing through fee credits

Standard revenue sharing

Understand your fiduciary responsibility

Every plan sponsor and every plan look a little different. So plan fiduciaries need to determine the approach that will best meet their needs. Since there are many factors to consider, an option may work well for one plan and not be the right choice for another.

Key questions for plan fiduciaries

As plan fiduciaries explore the various approaches, consider answering these questions.

How will fees be paid, by participants through revenue sharing, allocated explicitly to participant accounts, or paid by the plan sponsor?
If paid by participants, will the fees be paid in proportion to their account balance or as a flat fee amount?
If through revenue sharing, what amount is appropriate and is it important for participants to pay equally?
How will you communicate fees and payment methods to participants?

Ensuring a prudent process

The allocation of plan expenses among participants is a fiduciary act, which requires the fiduciary to act prudently. The Department of Labor (DOL) offers two primary principles to help guide plan committees as they make fee allocation decisions. These include:

Consider the interests of different classes of participants.
Determine how the method of allocation may affect each class.

With the above principles in mind, plan fiduciaries must gather and analyze the relevant facts to make an informed and reasoned decision based on participants’:

Account balances
Understanding plan fees
Knowledge of investment-related fees
Election of investment options

The DOL makes it clear the decision doesn’t have to benefit all participants equally.² But, regardless of the payment method selected, the plan fiduciary should provide a rational basis for the chosen approach. And the plan fiduciary should both understand and document the process used to arrive at that decision.

Considerations for a prudent process

Gather and evaluate relevant facts, including plan participant needs.
Assess available fee payment methods.
Determine how fees will be collected and document the process.
Provide clear, simple communication to build participant understanding.
Monitor.

Note: There’s no regulation that promotes or suggests any option discussed in this article over the others. Every plan fiduciary has an obligation to act in the best interest of plan participants and should adhere to all laws, regulations, and best practices.

Fee levelization

¹ An investment option may or may not provide revenue sharing.
² Field Assistance Bulletin 2003-03.

Intended for financial professionals or plan sponsors.

Principal Life Insurance Company is not a fiduciary in the broad context of operating your plan.

Principal^®, Principal Financial Group^®, and Principal and the logomark design are registered trademarks of Principal Financial Services, Inc., a Principal Fiancial Group company, in the United States and are trademarks and services marks of principal Financial Services, Inc., in various countries around the world.

The subject matter in this communication is educational only and provided with the understanding that Principal^® is not rendering legal, accounting, investment advice or tax advice. You should consult with appropriate counsel or other advisors on all matters pertaining to legal, tax, investment or accounting obligations and requirements.

2913742-052023

Securities offered through Principal Securities, Inc., member SIPC

Insurance products and plan administrative services provided through Principal Life Insurance Co., a member of the Principal Financial Group^®, Des Moines, IA 50392.